Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 10:33
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
WhatsApp backs Apple in its legal row with the UK over user data - BBC
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Is it ok to be spanked by your parents if you are not in bed in your set bedtime?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
"Oh, Mary!" star Cole Escola manifested their Tony win the old-fashioned way - Salon.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Top Cardiovascular Researcher Sounds Alarm Over Current Heart Health Guidelines - SciTechDaily
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
People with COPD had more carbon in their lungs than smokers in study - The Washington Post
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Opal Suchata Chuangsri from Thailand crowned Miss World 2025 - CNN